Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SKYFALL Post-Release

I felt that this movie promoted the exact opposite. That this movie was the end of their "Bond Begins" trilogy and ends up where Dr. No begins (Mendes has said as much). And that the Aston Martin in this movie (and CR by proxy) is meant to show us how he got the car in Goldfinger. Which feels really weird to me. On one hand, they're playing fast and loose with continuity, on the other hand they're trying to tie the Craig incarnation of Bond into the Connery one. It's such a weird and unnecessary decision, I think.

Reply

So the Aston Martin in this movie is the one he will get when Craig's Bond has his version of the Goldfinger story?

Even though the Aston in Skyfall gets shot/blown up?

And the car in Casino Royale is left-hand drive and in Skyfall it's right-hand drive?

And it's just not the same car?

And it's just not the same car?

And it's just not the same car?

Reply

I completely forgot it got blown up. I'm an idiot.

It's still weird to think it's not meant to be the same car that he wins in CR and have just pimped up and had the steering moved for use in England. The Craig movies definitely seem to have a continutity between them.

Reply
AYeah, I'd say that's the car he won in CR. Six years have passed since that mission for Bond, I'm sure he had plenty of time to do custom jobs and such with it.

As for SF being part of the "Bond Begins" storyline, that doesn't seem true. SF is more about Bond getting his groove back. He's supposed to be a veteran by this point. I took Mendes' comments about it taking place spiritually before DR. NO as in he's slowly bringing back more of the old school elements for the 21st century.
Reply

But he gets his 00-status in Casino Royale. So he's a veteran of British Intelligence but still a slightly novice 00? What does the 00-status even mean? Is it like a promotion from standard agent to something like a Black Ops agent?

Reply

Copycats have started...or something.

Daft bit of journalism, but quite a cool photo and a mad bit of thievery.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/c...entre.html

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrknudsen View Post

But he gets his 00-status in Casino Royale. So he's a veteran of British Intelligence but still a slightly novice 00? What does the 00-status even mean? Is it like a promotion from standard agent to something like a Black Ops agent?

He's an ex-Royal Navy officer, probably Special Boat Service then normal intelligence work, who is newly promoted to 00-status in CR. His first and second missions are against Le Chiffre and Greene. He then has six (?) years or so of missions, before we meet up with him in Istanbul. Hence, his relative veteran status in Skyfall and his "resurrection" at the end as a viable agent (reporting to a man working seemingly for a secret service that has embraced the 70s both in office decor and secretary appointments. Retro!).

00-status I think means you are can be ordered to kill, possibly as a standing order although Bond doesn't seem to operate generally without instructions at least as to overall objectives from M. No word on whether M in turn has to obtain specific Class Seven authorisation from the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs first.

Reply
AYup. In CR Bond notes that 00 agents have a very short life expectancy, so I'd guess having been one for six years since CR makes Bond one of the few longer lasting 00 agents in the service.
Reply

Thanks for the answers." id="yui_3_7_3_1_1352221633790_892" rel="http://files.chud.com/images/smilies/smile.gif">

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhp1608 View Post

00-status I think means you are can be ordered to kill, possibly as a standing order although Bond doesn't seem to operate generally without instructions at least as to overall objectives from M. No word on whether M in turn has to obtain specific Class Seven authorisation from the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs first.

Having 00 status I think means you're authorized to kill without getting much shit from your superiors. License To Kill and such.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by cognizant View Post

Yeah, continuity in this franchise is a headache, but I like to think Skyfall promotes the idea that 'Bond' and 'M' are just codenames used by agents over the years.

Skyfall has his parents' headstone in it. Last name Bond.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrknudsen View Post

They're trying to tie the Craig incarnation of Bond into the Connery one.

I think viewers might be, not the filmmakers.

Reply

Spider-Man gets more damaged by bullets than Bond. Continuity does not seem like a big priority considering.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Stockslivevan View Post

Yeah, I'd say that's the car he won in CR. Six years have passed since that mission for Bond, I'm sure he had plenty of time to do custom jobs and such with it.
As for SF being part of the "Bond Begins" storyline, that doesn't seem true. SF is more about Bond getting his groove back. He's supposed to be a veteran by this point. I took Mendes' comments about it taking place spiritually before DR. NO as in he's slowly bringing back more of the old school elements for the 21st century.

This.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil View Post

Skyfall has his parents' headstone in it. Last name Bond.

I think viewers might be, not the filmmakers.

Righto.  The Craig films have no connection to the original 20 films series.  They are the first three installments in a new Bond series, not a prequel to the old one.

Reply

Ah, good point about the headstones.  Truly a weird and wonderful franchise.

Usually I'm open-minded when it comes to criticism of something I enjoy, but this time round I'm not really understanding the flak the film has been getting in this thread.  Compared to most Bond films this one is filled to the brim with quality.  It's an attempt to raise the franchise a tad above its cheesy roots and should be commended for not appearing too much like it was written by a committee ticking off checkboxes.  I especially love the fact that the climax does not involve a villain's lair exploding as the hero flees.  I can only see one man save the world so many times before I lose my mind from boredom, I'd much rather see him try to save an individual he cares about.

Deakins deserves an Oscar nomination at the very least (if anyone cares about that kind of thing), and Thomas Newman's soundtrack is great.

Reply

Some random points:

-First half is AMAZING. Second half, might as well be watching Sam Mendes walk to the ATM.

-Dude, Bond flat-out DIES in the beginning. I know, Bond is unstoppable, whatever whatever. I as a non-Bond expert, I couldn't help but think this fortysomething dude just got shot twice and fell probably fifty feet into the water. And then a damned waterfall - THAT looked like he was deader than hell.

Made me think, and a smarter man can piece this together better than me... what if Bond is dead, and the movie is his trying to literally bring himself back to life? Visually, I think there are more than a few hellish landscapes in his scenes with Silva. And the whole thing ends in a Church, where maternal figure M kicks the bucket. But then what to make of the period where he recovers from that opening fall by (obviously!) shacking up with a beautiful woman and just lounging for a couple of weeks?

-Bond is bisexual. Let's just get that out in the open.

-More than a few people I chatted with after the screening pointed out the Batman parallels. Some because Batman is always fresh in the mind of a nerd, and some because... come on. Dude's even got his own Alfred!

-Craig is considerably less handsome now than he was during Casino Royale.

-Gorgeous title sequence. Glad to see this on a massive screen.

Q was qute! Oh, Ben Whishaw, you're adorable, I hope they give you more to do next time.

-Maybe it's fifty years of Bond, but I didn't feel ANY suspense during any point of this movie.

-Disappointing that Silva starts out being so fun, and then you find out that his plan is asinine all along, and he starts having those contemporary movie villain mannerisms where he's both grandiose/ridiculous and also sort of exhausted, bored and overall exasperated.

-Too many action movie tropes for my liking. The hacker that can hack the world with hacking all the time forever. The fluctuating ability level of some characters. Endless wordless henchmen. That sort of thing.

Otherwise, good fun, but a sharp comedown from the first half to the second.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe T View Post

Some random points:

-First half is AMAZING. Second half, might as well be watching Sam Mendes walk to the ATM.

Really? If you think that's an example of a director doing nothing but cashing a check, I suggest you go and watch something made by Brett Ratner. You may be surprised by what you see.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe T View Post

-Bond is bisexual. Let's just get that out in the open.

Fucking hell, no, no he isn't.

He was simply getting the last word with Silva rather than let him see he was uncomfortable.

Reply

Nah, come on. That wasn't his first rodeo. Wink

Reply

To paraphrase Mr. Bat Out of Hell...

"Bond would do anything for England.  Bond would do anything for England.  Yes, even that."

Reply

"No more foreplay"

"For England, James?"

"For England, Al-oooaaargggh..."

"...?"

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabe T View Post

-Maybe it's fifty years of Bond, but I didn't feel ANY suspense during any point of this movie.

-Disappointing that Silva starts out being so fun, and then you find out that his plan is asinine all along, and he starts having those contemporary movie villain mannerisms where he's both grandiose/ridiculous and also sort of exhausted, bored and overall exasperated.

To the first point-- I felt the opposite, actually. Since the film is often about Bond's mortality and the ravages age and service have on an operative's ability to perform in the field, literally anything he did had the capacity to set me on edge, whether he's ducking and covering to protect himself from a runaway train or hanging on to the bottom of an elevator by one hand. (That part in particular had my nerves up. Partly because heights terrify me and partly because of how Mendes and Craig play the scene.) I don't really feel much fear for him in the komodo dragon pit, but that's because it's one of the most Bond-familiar set pieces in the film, and of course Q-tech saves the day.

But outside of those moments, I felt a lot of suspense for Bond in moments of physical duress-- and I honestly thought the film did an excellent job at making M's survival a question mark.

As for Silva, I liked his plan, which is basically all about revenging himself on M and not about stereotypically nefarious, villainous ends. Frankly, it's less asinine than many plans put in effect by Bond's various nemeses throughout the series; he just wants to discredit M before killing her himself, and I don't have much of an impression that he cared a whole lot about what might happen in the event that he succeeds. I liked that. I liked that his entire campaign is motivated by self-interest, much like many of Bond's other opponents, but his version of self-interest is far more personal and, honestly, far more emotionally informed.

I mean, the guy's nuts, but he's nuts in a way that's interesting to me.

I do get why people are kind of down on the last act of the film-- it's a sudden, shrieking halt of storytelling, a total loss in momentum after the rest of the movie builds and builds and builds-- but as much as the last third of the movie tones things down somewhat, I still dug it. Then again I'm one of the proponents of the entire philosophy of opening Bond up and showing the audience who he is beneath his super spy veneer (and frankly I think that exploration is going to make Craig's portrayal of Bond as definitive as Connery's). So the further we get into Skyfall, and the further Bond becomes more of a man and less of a womanizing martini afficionado packing a Walther, the more intrigued I became. I do wish that some of that inertia from the rest of the film remained, but it didn't come to a grinding halt for me.

Reply
AEven Armond likes it: http://cityarts.info/2012/11/07/on-his-m...t-service/
Reply

Whoa, hey, Armond White likes it? I dunno, maybe I'm not so hot on it anymore.

Kidding, of course, but I don't know what to make of the fact that he and I see eye-to-eye on this one. In a weird way that's gratifying.

Reply
A(EDIT -- Whoops!)
Reply
A[quote name="cognizant" url="/community/t/145354/skyfall-post-release/100#post_3416992"]Yeah, continuity in this franchise is a headache, but I like to think Skyfall promotes the idea that 'Bond' and 'M' are just codenames used by agents over the years. [/quote]

I've always hated this theory. Why do all of the Bonds say the same things and enjoy the same drinks? Why does Roger Moore visit the grave of George Lazenby's wife?
Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Shape View Post


I've always hated this theory. Why do all of the Bonds say the same things and enjoy the same drinks? Why does Roger Moore visit the grave of George Lazenby's wife?

I prefer to just think that Bond's a Time Lord who regenerates into a new guy every time he is killed by some diabolical villain.

Reply

Well, the movie does sort of support that theory. At the end, when Bond returns to headquarters and meets Mallory in his office, what does he refer to him as? "M". "M" is just a title of station. But I also think that theory extends mostly just to M and Bond is really his own man.

Then again I'm also not a crazy-diehard Bond fan, so take what I say on the matter with a grain of salt.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Shape View Post


I've always hated this theory. Why do all of the Bonds say the same things and enjoy the same drinks? Why does Roger Moore visit the grave of George Lazenby's wife?

DESTINY!

I have to reiterate how good the soundtrack is, I've had it on a loop all week.  It's got great character.  I've never really got into Bond soundtracks much, after a while the bombastic orchestra starts to sound the same, but this one is a keeper, every track has memorable melody.  I love 'Shanghai Drive'.

Reply

You know, I was just watching American Horror Story and Joseph Fiennes appeared (on the screen - not in my home), and I thought to myself how much less talented he is than his brother (you know I'm right). Anyway, it also got me thinking about Skyfall and about where Ralph's character ends up and I'm really, really happy about that choice. I'm very much looking forward to him handing out assignments to Bond in future instalments.

Reply

cognizant, Adele's Song Skyfall is not included in the CD!  I guess they want everyone to buy the single as well.

Reply
AActually it's not on the soundtrack also because there was no more room for a one disc release. They would have had to expand it two two discs to get the whole score including Adele's song, but few labels ever really do that unless they're special editions and those are usually done many years after the film's release. I believe this was the same case for the Casino Royale soundtrack not featuring "You Know My Name" and a number of other cues. It's not surprise though since the two films are two and a half hours long.
Reply

Just to be geeky - the version of Adele's Skyfall in the opening credits is a slightly different version to the single version.

Reply

I think it was a given that I would like this more than Quantum but I can't really see why so many people are flipping out over this one. I don't know if it's because I'm still riding high off of how much Casino Royale blew me away or because I've never been the biggest Bond fan or that I expected more but it never grabbed me the way I wanted it to. Bardem was quirky goodness but I felt he was shy of being great. I saw Fiennes becoming M a mile away and was underwhelmed by Whishaw's Q, who I expected far more from. I liked Naomie (meow) but she seemed a tad underused. And Daniel, as always, was great but I found it weird that we get yet another story where his reliability is in question. I will say that I felt that it got more interesting as it went on because of it touching upon his origins.

In the end I'll say the film is theater-worthy, beautifully shot, and should be experienced on IMAX*, if possible.

(And who else was bugged by the effect used to photoshop the actors' heads on the stunt doubles during the motorcycle chase at the beginning? It instantly ripped me out.)

*A standout with this format being the silhouetted fist-fight in Shanghai with the muzzle flash illuminating the actors every now and then.

Reply

OH GOD THAT SHANGHAI FIST FIGHT.  Gorgeous and brutal.  Just SO well done.

I had a ball with this one.  It's a bit shaggy, but it's always moving and just so weird at times.  And just GORGEOUS.

Loved Thomas Newman's score.  It still felt like his work, but working in a Bond context gave it a pizazz.

And Bardem's performance had me giggling constantly.  Genius.  GENIUS.

Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post

OH GOD THAT SHANGHAI FIST FIGHT.  Gorgeous and brutal.  Just SO well done.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike's Pants View Post

It just seems to get the formula right. It's fun and at the same time as serious as a heart attack. It has a brilliant villain (with a pretty grim physical deformity). It has heart and genuine emotional stakes. It has some stunning action (there is a silhouetted fist fight that is stunning.)

I told you about the fist fight! I TOLD YOU ALL ABOUT THE FIST FIGHT! I WIN THE INTERNET!

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)